Hi,
I'm in the UK now but on vacation this week so will have limited responses.
Guy Rixon wrote:
>On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Paul Harrison wrote:
>
>
>
>>Cannot the functionality be simply overloaded on createNode?
>>
>>
>
>The idea was to avoid overloading operation names. There's a rumor that
>overloading doesn't work consistently with doc/literal/wrapped.
>
>
The problem is that although the WSDL 1.1 spec does allow for the
overloading, it is not very well known or documented so the support for
this is not universal - I seem to remember that .Net does not interpret
an overloaded operation properly. WSDL 2.0 no longer supports this type
of useful overloading.
Cheers,
Matthew Received on 2006-06-20Z10:30:29