Re: Bug(s) in definition of <DEFINITIONS> and <INFO>?

From: Markus Dolensky <Markus.Dolensky-at-eso.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 20:41:20 +0100


Hi Steve,

> In addition to the question of maintaining the official definition of
> the VOTable schema as it evolves, I'm also interested in the easiest way
> to keep development code in sync with the schema.

One could offer a test suite and collect sample documents and guidelines how a compliant parser should perform.

Another thought: When encountering an unknown element in a contiguous stream it may not be clear to which point a rollback should be performed. But this is probably too far off your original question.

Markus

+---

| Markus Dolensky   Mailto:Markus.Dolensky-at-eso.org
| AVO Senior System Engineer  Web: www.euro-vo.org
| Voice: ++49 89 32006/261  Fax: ++49 89 32006/480
+--- Received on 2002-11-14Z08:46:56