> 1) We did not see any way to describe (in a machine-readable
This is actually something I'd find useful too, it would save you having to parse the entire table just to find out how big it was, and I don't think there is a standard way of doing it, although I might have overlooked one?
It seems like something people would want to do, so if there isn't already a way to do it, maybe an _optional_ attribute to TABLEDATA like...
<DATA>
<TABLEDATA ROWS="2344">
...would be the way to go? Any support? Disagreement? Or just no interest?
Al.
-- Dr. A. Allan, School of Physics, University of ExeterReceived on 2003-10-23Z13:08:49