> > Follow that, not sure I entirely agree that the order-specifc(ness)
> > of the format is strictly necessary, or "good". But I guess its entirely
> > argueable... and as I mentioned before, while I do a good imitation, I'm
> > not actually an XML purist.
>
> I did not mean to imply that the order specificity is _necessary_ from a
> logical standpoint - I only meant to indicate that it is _required_ by
> the standard.
Yup...
> So, have we beat this horse to death? :^)
I do hope so... ;)
Al.
-- Dr. A. Allan, School of Physics, University of ExeterReceived on 2003-10-23Z20:58:48