Re: VOTable alternative?

From: Alasdair Allan <aa-at-astro.ex.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:15:57 +0000 (GMT)

> > That isn't awkwardness, its cleverness.
> >
> > The file can be pointed to using a URI, the file could be located
> > anywhere. This means the only thing that has to be passed by
> > intermediate services is a small bundle of XML, which has all the
> > descriptive meta-data.
>
> I guess that bit is clever, if it always works properly. My feelings may
> be coloured by recalling IRAF some years ago. One of its bulk data
> formats had data in one file, metadata in a separate file. That gave
> endless trouble to users, who kept finding the two didn't always travel
> together...

Yes, but since the XML file has a URI to the data file, if you have the XML you can always find the data, and the XML is the thing you push down the wire.

Al.

-- 
Dr. A. Allan, School of Physics, University of Exeter
Received on 2004-01-20Z17:16:30