Sounds good for me.
A short abstract and a link is a simple but sufficient way to do what Mark has
proposed. It must be an easy way to see quickly which VOTable (Mark's mail was
about VOTable but it would be nice to have such a page for each working group)
tools are available. Versioning can be let on each tool page.
André
En réponse à Alasdair Allan <aa-at-astro.ex.ac.uk>:
>
> > Well, officially any code written using NVO money is supposed to be
> > there. But, in addition, anything that would be useful for VO
> developers
> > to incorporate into their projects may also be there. As Mark points
> > out, it would be nice to have a site for VO developers to go to and a
> > CVS site is easy to keep up to date.
>
> But all the rest of the VO projects have their own CVS, and if we check
> our code into your CVS we loose the versioning information from our own
> archives up to that point. That isn't really optimal.
>
> A page with links to all the different projects CVS archives with a
> brief
> description (and screenshots?) of what the
> projects/application/libraries
> in all the (different) CVS archives do would be nice.
>
> Al.
> --
> Dr. A. Allan, School of Physics, University of Exeter
>
Received on 2004-02-03Z22:19:22